Hello,
I have a WAPT Enterprise server (version 2.6.0.16714) installed on Debian (which we'll call wapt1).
To reduce network congestion and WADS/WAPT WUA requests, I decided to create secondary repositories for the WAPT WUA and WADS services:
- wapt2 will serve as the WAPT WUA repository
- wapt3 will serve as the WADS repository.
I therefore set up two separate machines and configured their synchronization so that they only retrieve the relevant directories.
Synchronization works correctly in the /opt/wapt/repository directory.
I then created repository rules stipulating that agents with an IP address belonging to the 192.168.0.0/16 network access:
- wapt2 for the wua folder
- wapt3 for the wads folder.
I also configured the use_repo_rules variable to true in the general agent configuration.
The secondary repositories contain the remote-repo-conf and remote-repo-nginx packages (as well as remote-repo-tftp).
However, when I check on a machine matching the defined rules, I don't see the secondary repositories, and it seems they aren't being used in their new role.
I've probably missed a step, but I can't figure out which one.
Can you help me, please?
Establishment of secondary depots
Forum Rules
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
-
sfonteneau
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 2318
- Registered: July 10, 2014 - 11:52 PM
- Contact :
Hello
, could you please provide details of the rule that was created?
, could you please provide details of the rule that was created?
-
vincent.moisan
- Messages: 20
- Registration: January 24, 2023 - 11:44
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot 2026-02-11 131201.png (13.35 KB) Viewed 4443 times
-
sfonteneau
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 2318
- Registered: July 10, 2014 - 11:52 PM
- Contact :
The rule only mentions wua, so it won't be very visible on the client side.
You'll mainly see it if, for example, you delete wsusscn2.cab from a machine and the machine re-downloads the file.
You can also verify that downloads are indeed going through this repository by looking at the audit data:
host_metrics - peercache.
In the URLs, you'll see the source URL.
You'll mainly see it if, for example, you delete wsusscn2.cab from a machine and the machine re-downloads the file.
You can also verify that downloads are indeed going through this repository by looking at the audit data:
host_metrics - peercache.
In the URLs, you'll see the source URL.
-
sfonteneau
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 2318
- Registered: July 10, 2014 - 11:52 PM
- Contact :
Actually, secondary repositories aren't for remote sites? Is this a secondary repository for your local network?vincent.moisan wrote: ↑Feb 11, 2026 - 12:53 PM To relieve network congestion and WADS/WAPT WUA requests, I decided to create secondary repositories for the WAPT WUA and WADS services.
-
vincent.moisan
- Messages: 20
- Registration: January 24, 2023 - 11:44
So, not very useful.
What I'd like is for the agents to no longer go through the main server for WaptWua and WADs.
So, a rule that redirects them to the correct repository depending on what's being requested.
The main server would then be used, in a way, only for application deployments.
Wapt2 would be used only for WaptWua, and Wapt3 for all OS deployments.
What I'd like is for the agents to no longer go through the main server for WaptWua and WADs.
So, a rule that redirects them to the correct repository depending on what's being requested.
The main server would then be used, in a way, only for application deployments.
Wapt2 would be used only for WaptWua, and Wapt3 for all OS deployments.
-
vincent.moisan
- Messages: 20
- Registration: January 24, 2023 - 11:44
Yes. It's for a local network. It's an idea that was suggested by one of your trainers to relieve the load on the main server.sfonteneau wrote: ↑Feb 11, 2026 - 1:56 PMActually, secondary repositories aren't for remote sites? Is this a secondary repository for your local network?vincent.moisan wrote: ↑Feb 11, 2026 - 12:53 PM To relieve network congestion and WADS/WAPT WUA requests, I decided to create secondary repositories for the WAPT WUA and WADS services.
-
sfonteneau
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 2318
- Registered: July 10, 2014 - 11:52 PM
- Contact :
Secondary repositories are mainly used for remote sites behind a VPN (low bandwidth connection).
Often, the secondary repository hosts everything.
In your case, setting up a repository like this seems unnecessary.
Perhaps there was some misunderstanding?
Often, the secondary repository hosts everything.
In your case, setting up a repository like this seems unnecessary.
Perhaps there was some misunderstanding?
-
dcardon
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 1929
- Registration: June 18, 2014 - 09:58
- Location: Saint Sébastien sur Loire
- Contact :
@vincent.moisan,
do you have a Wapt server running on Windows? If so, it could be relevant because nginx on Windows isn't very performant. If the server is running Linux and is properly sized, it can serve 10,000 machines and easily saturate a 10Gb link...
Best regards,
Denis
do you have a Wapt server running on Windows? If so, it could be relevant because nginx on Windows isn't very performant. If the server is running Linux and is properly sized, it can serve 10,000 machines and easily saturate a 10Gb link...
Best regards,
Denis
Denis Cardon - Tranquil IT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
-
vincent.moisan
- Messages: 20
- Registration: January 24, 2023 - 11:44
No, they are 3 Debian servers. The problem is network sizing. Our servers are VMs on KVM. So the congestion occurs first on the WAPT server, or if that's not the case, on the hypervisor or the network gateway.dcardon wrote: ↑Feb 11, 2026 - 2:16 PM @vincent.moisan
Do you have a Wapt server running on Windows? If so, it could be relevant because nginx on Windows isn't very performant. If the server is running Linux and is properly sized, it can serve 10k machines and easily saturate a 10Gb link...
Best regards,
Denis
We have 650 workstations downloading Windows 11 25H2 updates, each 12GB in size. However, this is clearly not feasible if we want to deploy operating systems, patch software vulnerabilities, and perform Windows Update applications (WUA), all on the same server. Therefore, the goal is to create secondary repositories to avoid overloading the network when all these tasks need to be performed simultaneously
