Tranquil IT Forum

Good morning,

Can we expect the following to be taken into account? Public repository maintained by Tranquil IT Systems (and other WAPT public repositories) by Repology ?

It seems that only a few mandatory pieces of information are missing in order to be able to request or suggest the addition :

• Description of a line from the packet. (already indicated)
• Package owner(s). (already indicated = Maintainer)
• URL(s) of the package's homepage. (already indicated = License)
• Download URL(s) for the package.
• License information.
• Package category. (already indicated)

However, this also requires structuring the snapshot of this information in JSON format…

I would very much like to know Tranquil IT's opinion on this subject, but also the opinion of other people who maintain a public WAPT repository (if any exist on this forum), please!