Hello and thank you for your quick reply, Simon.
Using HTTPS authentication in postconf solves this problem, but it blocks my external workstations that use the reverse proxy.
My situation is complex; I use two domains for my WAPT server, one internal, for my...
The search returned 24 results
- January 23, 2024 - 4:58 AM
- Forum: WAPT Server
- Subject: [RESOLVED] Devices marked as reachable in the console even though they are turned off
- Answers: 2
- Views : 3520
- January 22, 2024 - 08:01
- Forum: WAPT Server
- Subject: [RESOLVED] Devices marked as reachable in the console even though they are turned off
- Answers: 2
- Views : 3520
[RESOLVED] Devices marked as reachable in the console even though they are turned off
Debian: 12
nginx: 1.24
Wapt server: 2.5.2.15207
Hello,
We just upgraded from Wapt 2.4 to 2.5.
The workstations reconnected correctly after the Wapt server upgrade, but they remain "reachable" even when powered off. I should mention that this didn't happen in version 2.4 with the same server configuration...
nginx: 1.24
Wapt server: 2.5.2.15207
Hello,
We just upgraded from Wapt 2.4 to 2.5.
The workstations reconnected correctly after the Wapt server upgrade, but they remain "reachable" even when powered off. I should mention that this didn't happen in version 2.4 with the same server configuration...
- October 12, 2022 - 4:49 AM
- Forum: Your opinion
- Subject: [SOLVED] Using Wapt for MS server updates
- Answers: 2
- Views : 30243
[SOLVED] Using Wapt for MS server updates
Hello,
I have a practical question: is it advisable to use WUA for updating our MS 2022 servers?
I mean, in terms of best practices, can we safely delegate the deployment of updates to our servers to Wapt rather than using a more conventional solution (e.g., Wapt update...).
I have a practical question: is it advisable to use WUA for updating our MS 2022 servers?
I mean, in terms of best practices, can we safely delegate the deployment of updates to our servers to Wapt rather than using a more conventional solution (e.g., Wapt update...).
- September 12, 2022 - 06:24
- Forum: Your opinion
- Subject: [RESOLVED] Wapt@lists.wapt.fr mailing list. Rejected emails
- Answers: 5
- Views : 31703
- September 9, 2022 - 9:28 AM
- Forum: WAPT Server
- Subject: [RESOLVED] Upgrading to Wapt server 2.2.3 / repository not visible
- Answers: 3
- Views : 3101
Re: Update to Wapt server 2.2.3 / repository not visible
Thank you very much for your feedback.
Actually, I thought it was the final version because it was in the changelog of the documentation. Sorry for the noise.
Best regards,
David.
Actually, I thought it was the final version because it was in the changelog of the documentation. Sorry for the noise.
Best regards,
David.
- September 7, 2022 - 8:50 AM
- Forum: Your opinion
- Subject: [RESOLVED] Wapt@lists.wapt.fr mailing list. Rejected emails
- Answers: 5
- Views : 31703
[RESOLVED] Wapt@lists.wapt.fr mailing list. Rejected emails
Hello,
Gmail addresses and similar addresses are being rejected by a CBL filter (see below).
Furthermore, no messages have been received or posted to the list since August 25th, see: https://lists.wapt.fr/pipermail/wapt.
Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------
From: Mail ...
Gmail addresses and similar addresses are being rejected by a CBL filter (see below).
Furthermore, no messages have been received or posted to the list since August 25th, see: https://lists.wapt.fr/pipermail/wapt.
Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------
From: Mail ...
- September 6, 2022 - 8:55 AM
- Forum: WAPT Server
- Subject: [RESOLVED] Upgrading to Wapt server 2.2.3 / repository not visible
- Answers: 3
- Views : 3101
[RESOLVED] Update to Wapt server 2.2.3 / repository not visible
Hello,
the server isn't seeing version 2.2.3 in the repository; it's only accepting version 2.2.2.12388 from July 22nd.
Or am I doing something wrong?
Thank you for your help.
Best regards.
the server isn't seeing version 2.2.3 in the repository; it's only accepting version 2.2.2.12388 from July 22nd.
Or am I doing something wrong?
Thank you for your help.
Best regards.
- January 21, 2022 - 02:41
- Forum: WAPT Server
- Subject: [RESOLVED] Invalid Wapt URL access
- Answers: 2
- Views : 3987
Re: Invalid Wapt URL access
Good morning,
Indeed, I hadn't seen the latest update.
However, a double slash remains, but it's not a blocking issue:
THANKS.
Indeed, I hadn't seen the latest update.
However, a double slash remains, but it's not a blocking issue:
THANKS.
- January 17, 2022 - 09:07
- Forum: WAPT Server
- Subject: [RESOLVED] Invalid Wapt URL access
- Answers: 2
- Views : 3987
[RESOLVED] Invalid Wapt URL access
Debian 10.11
Wapt 2.1.2 Enterprise
Hello,
I'm getting an error in the path when setting up the GPO for deploying the Wapt agent (triple slash), and also when I try to manually download the agent (https://wapt/waptagent.exe). I do have a "wapt" record in DNS pointing to...
Wapt 2.1.2 Enterprise
Hello,
I'm getting an error in the path when setting up the GPO for deploying the Wapt agent (triple slash), and also when I try to manually download the agent (https://wapt/waptagent.exe). I do have a "wapt" record in DNS pointing to...
- November 3, 2021 - 2:39 AM
- Forum: WAPT Packages
- Subject: Windows 10 upgrade (English)
- Answers: 4
- Views : 4734
Re: Windows 10 upgrade (English)
Hello,
if I let the ISO download via the Microsoft utility, it doesn't work; I have to use the EN-US ISO, which is only available in VLSC. They are not the same.
I also had this problem related to the OS installation language, which can be set to EN-GB instead of EN...
if I let the ISO download via the Microsoft utility, it doesn't work; I have to use the EN-US ISO, which is only available in VLSC. They are not the same.
I also had this problem related to the OS installation language, which can be set to EN-GB instead of EN...
