Hello.
In the console (v1.3.5), the "groups" display column is now empty.
Any ideas?
Thanks
, Raphaël Larronde
Group display problem
Forum Rules
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
Re.
Yes, the names are there, in var/www/wapt in my case.
The Holy Spirit must be called Raphael, me in this instance... I don't know when it started, but I think it's after the server change, switching from a Windows server to Debian.
I'm attaching screenshots.
Yes, the names are there, in var/www/wapt in my case.
The Holy Spirit must be called Raphael, me in this instance... I don't know when it started, but I think it's after the server change, switching from a Windows server to Debian.
I'm attaching screenshots.
- Attachments
-
- wapt1.png (124.69 KB) Viewed 5382 times
-
- wapt2.png (112.26 KB) Viewed 5382 times
-
- wapt.png (199.27 KB) Viewed 5382 times
Raphaël Larronde,
Saint Joseph High School
, 64240 Hasparren
Saint Joseph High School
, 64240 Hasparren
Yes,
indeed, there's a good chance that's the reason.
I think that when you migrate from one to the other, certain parameters are lost, including the group, unless the personal packet on each machine carries this information (to be confirmed).
Just out of curiosity, why did you switch from one to the other?
indeed, there's a good chance that's the reason.
I think that when you migrate from one to the other, certain parameters are lost, including the group, unless the personal packet on each machine carries this information (to be confirmed).
Just out of curiosity, why did you switch from one to the other?
There's a chance, but I created new package groups and they don't appear either. Weird.
The Windows server version works perfectly, but the PC was also used as a backup for our educational server. So I installed OpenMediaVault (which is Debian-based) instead of Windows 10, and WAPT as well.
I already asked TIS about this; here's their reply: "There are many advantages to having a Debian server instead of Windows...
but it's also a matter of habit:
- quick to install (a very basic 32-bit Debian + the tis-waptserver package which installs the dependencies)
- lighter "hardware" requirements (a Debian Wapt server: 256MB of RAM, 30GB of disk space for the Wapt packages. A "current" Windows server is a bit more...). We've set up Wapt servers on Raspberry Pi equivalents running Debian.
- easy to duplicate: rsync is enough
- easy to back up: rsync is enough... -> tisbackup
- easy to administer (ssh...) and update (apt...)
- no Windows license to purchase and manage, although for some administrations, it's not expensive.
And for those who don't yet know Debian, it's a good opportunity to try it...
Hubert TOUVET"
The Windows server version works perfectly, but the PC was also used as a backup for our educational server. So I installed OpenMediaVault (which is Debian-based) instead of Windows 10, and WAPT as well.
I already asked TIS about this; here's their reply: "There are many advantages to having a Debian server instead of Windows...
but it's also a matter of habit:
- quick to install (a very basic 32-bit Debian + the tis-waptserver package which installs the dependencies)
- lighter "hardware" requirements (a Debian Wapt server: 256MB of RAM, 30GB of disk space for the Wapt packages. A "current" Windows server is a bit more...). We've set up Wapt servers on Raspberry Pi equivalents running Debian.
- easy to duplicate: rsync is enough
- easy to back up: rsync is enough... -> tisbackup
- easy to administer (ssh...) and update (apt...)
- no Windows license to purchase and manage, although for some administrations, it's not expensive.
And for those who don't yet know Debian, it's a good opportunity to try it...
Hubert TOUVET"
Raphaël Larronde,
Saint Joseph High School
, 64240 Hasparren
Saint Joseph High School
, 64240 Hasparren
Hi again,
thanks for the reply. The advantages are actually the flexibility of administration and the environment that Linux offers compared to Windows, which is significant. But in my case, the future managers don't want to deal with Linux; they're allergic to it. ^^
Let me know if your problem gets resolved.
Best regards.
thanks for the reply. The advantages are actually the flexibility of administration and the environment that Linux offers compared to Windows, which is significant. But in my case, the future managers don't want to deal with Linux; they're allergic to it. ^^
Let me know if your problem gets resolved.
Best regards.
