Hello,
After a recent deployment, I realized that some PCs are not showing up due to an identical UUID.
Not having paid attention during the deployment, I didn't note the IP addresses of the missing machines.
My question is therefore: is there a flexible way to address this issue, perhaps with a script that could be deployed to all machines?
Sincerely.
Uuid and machine reassembly
Forum Rules
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
- sfonteneau
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 2318
- Registered: July 10, 2014 - 11:52 PM
- Contact :
Good morning
So normally the behavior that should occur now is that the stations that have the same UUID should replace each other in the console
On the machines in question (it's often the same range of machines) you can do the following:
Or a WAPT package to apply as identical posts are reported:
So normally the behavior that should occur now is that the stations that have the same UUID should replace each other in the console
On the machines in question (it's often the same range of machines) you can do the following:
Code: Select all
wapt-get generate-uuidCode: Select all
def install():
WAPT.generate_host_uuid()
I know this topic is a bit old, but I did use this solution. However, there's a problem: you can't deploy this command to all workstations, otherwise you end up with duplicate entries that need to be deleted one by one, which can cause problems with a large network.
In my case, more than thirty workstations were affected :'(
In my case, more than thirty workstations were affected :'(
