Packet resignation error (WAPT 2.0 transition)

Questions about WAPT Packaging / Requests and help regarding Wapt packages.
Forum Rules
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
Christophe0110
Messages: 53
Registration: June 11, 2019 - 12:04

June 28, 2021 - 09:58

vcardon wrote: June 18, 2021 - 5:17 PM However, the documentation clearly states that a Linux server is better suited for production.

I'm commenting here to emphasize to any readers who might come across this post that a WAPT server running Windows is a courtesy granted, not a commitment.

You have the solution to your problem in your first post. Why not use Debian 10 for your production environment, as you successfully do for your pre-production environment? If your management insists on using a supported OS for your production environment, then Red Hat will be your best choice.
Good morning,

I understand that a Linux server is more suitable than a Windows server (and I agree with you on that point), but indeed, my management is "anti-Linux" and only wants Windows Server. I already had to negotiate to be able to run my pre-production server on Linux instead of Windows...
That's why I have no other choice but to use Windows for our production server... However, although I understand that this is not what is recommended, I had not had any particular problems before this 2.0 update.

In the meantime, I "solved" my problem with a rebuild followed by a manual upload-package for the large packages that weren't uploading. It's more work, but oh well...
Locked