[RESOLVED] Wake on LAN unicast

Questions about WAPT Server / Requests and help related to the WAPT server
Forum Rules
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
Locked
marcolefo
Messages: 27
Registration: Oct 02, 2018 - 11:13

April 10, 2026 - 2:33 PM

Good morning,

I would like to be able to use WOL from the WAPT console.
But I can't get it to work; I'm blocked by my firewall, which isn't allowing broadcast traffic. I'll look into that.

But WOL via unicast works. So, from the WAPT server command line, the following command works perfectly

Code: Select all

wakeonlan -i <ip> <adresse mac>
Is it possible to configure WAPT to use WOL in this way? Unicast instead of broadcast.

Thank you for your help.
WAPT Enterprise Server: 2.6.0.17343 / Server OS: Debian bookworm /
Administration/package creation machine OS: macOS 15
marcolefo
Messages: 27
Registration: Oct 02, 2018 - 11:13

April 10, 2026 - 5:08 PM

Okay, I managed to get it working through the firewall. ;)
But the question is still interesting, isn't it?
Have a good weekend.
WAPT Enterprise Server: 2.6.0.17343 / Server OS: Debian bookworm /
Administration/package creation machine OS: macOS 15
User avatar
dcardon
WAPT Expert
Messages: 1929
Registration: June 18, 2014 - 09:58
Location: Saint Sébastien sur Loire
Contact :

April 14, 2026 - 10:25

Hi Marc,

if I remember correctly, we send the subnet with the wakeonlan command, but not the exact IP address. Switches are usually happy with this configuration... It wouldn't be technically complicated to use the IP address instead, but we thought the best practice was to use the subnet (since the machine is potentially using DHCP, specifying the IP address doesn't necessarily make much sense).

Out of curiosity, what parameter on the switch must have been changed? :-)

Regards,

Denis
Denis Cardon - Tranquil IT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
Locked