Missing dependencies

Questions about WAPT Packaging / Requests and help regarding Wapt packages.
Forum Rules
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
Answer
jsdmc
Messages: 9
Registration: Nov. 30, 2018 - 3:56 p.m.

September 1, 2026 - 1:44 PM

Hello,

Our repository contains the packages "dmc-windows11-requirements" and "dmc-windows11-upgrade-25H2_Fr", which I have used several times.

Lately, we have been experiencing dependency issues.
When adding dmc-windows11-requirements to a machine package and installing updates, the machine enters an "UPGRADING" status with the following error in the logs:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\wapt\common.py", line 4316, in install_wapt
raise EWaptUnavailablePackage('Missing dependencies: %s' % (','.join(missing_depends,)))
waptpackage.EWaptUnavailablePackage: Missing dependencies: dmc-windows11-requirements

EWaptUnavailablePackage: Missing dependencies: dmc-windows11-requirements

However, this package does exist in the private repository.

Do you have any ideas?

A related question: when an application package is updated, we download the new package from the public repository. What should be done with the package containing the older version of the application?
Does the system:
- switch to "To-update" mode for this application as soon as a newer package with the same name is available?
- automatically apply the latest version?
- what should be done with the package containing the older version in the private repository?

Have a good day.

Wapt Community 2.6.1.17765 Linux server, Windows 11 console 25h2
User avatar
sfonteneau
WAPT Expert
Messages: 2363
Registered: July 10, 2014 - 11:52 PM
Contact :

September 1, 2026 - 1:52 PM

jsdmc wrote: Sep 01, 2026 - 1:44 p.m. waptpackage.EWaptUnavailablePackage: Missing dependencies: dmc-windows11-requirements
I see that the package has been tagged in

min_os_version: 10.0.18362

Could that be it?
jsdmc wrote: Sep 1, 2026 - 1:44 PM Related question: when an application package is updated, we download the new package from the public repository. What should be done with the package for the older version of the application?
Does:
- the machine switch to "To-update" mode for this application as soon as a newer package with the same name is available?
- is the latest version automatically applied?
Yes, if applicable, it will be installed automatically by the workstations (equivalent to a new version in a Debian repository)

[/quote]
jsdmc wrote: 01 Sep 2026 - 13:44 - what should be done with the package containing the old version in the private repository?
You can do whatever you want with it :) (This is a version that can be kept just in case)
Answer