Your screenshot shows a 4.1 GB ISO, not 16 GB as in the previous logs.
Is this an ISO that was modified to be 16 GB?
It's possible that it won't work either, because file uploads go through the /tmp directory of the machine, and if /tmp doesn't have enough space...
[RESOLVED] OS Deployment
Forum Rules
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
- sfonteneau
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 2318
- Registered: July 10, 2014 - 11:52 PM
- Contact :
-
admgautier
- Messages: 45
- Registration: Sep 24, 2018 - 4:48 p.m.
Hi Simon,
Yes, yesterday I encountered a disk space error. After fixing it, I re-imported the ISO, which is 12.8GB (yes, a modified ISO).
The download stopped at 100% with the following error: [Error
message here]. So I deleted the ISO and added it again. I just restarted the Nginx service. Is this the correct method to get a consistent hash?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Yes, yesterday I encountered a disk space error. After fixing it, I re-imported the ISO, which is 12.8GB (yes, a modified ISO).
The download stopped at 100% with the following error: [Error
message here]. So I deleted the ISO and added it again. I just restarted the Nginx service. Is this the correct method to get a consistent hash?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
- Attachments
-
- Download iso fail.png (28.95 KiB) Viewed 6717 times
- sfonteneau
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 2318
- Registered: July 10, 2014 - 11:52 PM
- Contact :
The hash is still incorrect.
At worst, you can transfer the file using WinSCP and then rename it.
We're running tests here by uploading very large ISO files to see...
At worst, you can transfer the file using WinSCP and then rename it.
We're running tests here by uploading very large ISO files to see...
-
admgautier
- Messages: 45
- Registration: Sep 24, 2018 - 4:48 p.m.
The installation is in progress, I am having problems with my answer file because you formatted the disk before downloading the Iso.
Do you happen to know which partition the Windows image is installed on? I tried forwarding one of your answer files and adding the command:
I found an error on the line<Path>
My original answer file contained the following code (and worked):
Thank you in advance for your feedback.
Anthony
Do you happen to know which partition the Windows image is installed on? I tried forwarding one of your answer files and adding the command:
Code: Select all
<ImageInstall>
<OSImage>
<InstallToAvailablePartition>true</InstallToAvailablePartition>
<InstallFrom>
<Path>install.wim</Path>
</OSImage>
</ImageInstall> My original answer file contained the following code (and worked):
Code: Select all
<ImageInstall>
<OSImage>
<InstallTo>
<DiskID>0</DiskID>
<PartitionID>4</PartitionID>
</InstallTo>
</OSImage>
</ImageInstall>Anthony
- sfonteneau
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 2318
- Registered: July 10, 2014 - 11:52 PM
- Contact :
Note that you must not format the disk in the XML file
In the Windows 10 template, it's done like this:
InstallToAvailablePartition true tells the Windows installer to handle it; it works well under Windows 10
In the Windows 11 UEFI template, this is how it's done because `InstallToAvailablePartition true` doesn't work properly (Windows 11 bug)
In a Windows 11 legacy (non-UEFI) system, it should be:
I believe
In the Windows 10 template, it's done like this:
Code: Select all
<ImageInstall>
<OSImage>
<InstallToAvailablePartition>true</InstallToAvailablePartition>
<InstallFrom>
<Path>install.wim</Path>
<MetaData>
<Key>/IMAGE/FLAGS</Key>
<Value>Professional</Value>
</MetaData>
</InstallFrom>
</OSImage>
</ImageInstall>
In the Windows 11 UEFI template, this is how it's done because `InstallToAvailablePartition true` doesn't work properly (Windows 11 bug)
Code: Select all
<ImageInstall>
<OSImage>
<InstallTo>
<PartitionID>3</PartitionID>
<DiskID>0</DiskID>
</InstallTo>
<InstallToAvailablePartition>false</InstallToAvailablePartition>
<WillShowUI>OnError</WillShowUI>
<InstallFrom>
<Path>install.wim</Path>
<MetaData>
<Key>/IMAGE/FLAGS</Key>
<Value>Professional</Value>
</MetaData>
</InstallFrom>
</OSImage>
</ImageInstall>
Code: Select all
<PartitionID>2</PartitionID>I believe
-
admgautier
- Messages: 45
- Registration: Sep 24, 2018 - 4:48 p.m.
Thank you for your feedback.
Yes, indeed, after analyzing your topics and the Windows 10 answer file, I noticed your configuration.
I'm currently fine-tuning the file, but the ISO is already downloading correctly, which is a victory in itself.
What's strange is that I'm getting an error message on the line ,
start a new thread to avoid mixing topics.
Thanks for your help. The team is awesome!!
Anthony
Yes, indeed, after analyzing your topics and the Windows 10 answer file, I noticed your configuration.
I'm currently fine-tuning the file, but the ISO is already downloading correctly, which is a victory in itself.
What's strange is that I'm getting an error message on the line ,
start a new thread to avoid mixing topics.
Thanks for your help. The team is awesome!!
Anthony
- sfonteneau
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 2318
- Registered: July 10, 2014 - 11:52 PM
- Contact :
No closing InstallFrom tag in my opinionadmgautier wrote: ↑Sep 29, 2022 - 3:03 PM
What's strange is that I'm getting an error message on the line ..
-
admgautier
- Messages: 45
- Registration: Sep 24, 2018 - 4:48 p.m.
Hehe, that was exactly it!
I'm waiting to see how the new installation goes...
Thanks again
I'm waiting to see how the new installation goes...
Thanks again
- dcardon
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 1932
- Registration: June 18, 2014 - 09:58
- Location: Saint Sébastien sur Loire
- Contact :
Thank you for your feedback.
I'm marking this topic as RESOLVED. Please open a new topic if you encounter any further problems.
Sincerely,
Denis
I'm marking this topic as RESOLVED. Please open a new topic if you encounter any further problems.
Sincerely,
Denis
Denis Cardon - Tranquil IT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
