Hello,
I'd just like to know if WAPT has already been deployed on Snapdragon architecture PCs. We're currently using WAPT 2.5.5.15691 and would like to explore the feasibility of upgrading our entire fleet (or at least part of it) to Snapdragon processors.
If not, is this planned for the future?
Thanks in advance.
[RESOLVED] WAPT PC Clients with Snapdragon Processor
Forum Rules
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
Community Forum Rules
* English support on www.reddit.com/r/wapt
* French community support is available on this forum
* Please prefix the topic title with [RESOLVED] if it is resolved.
* Please do not edit a topic that is tagged [RESOLVED]. Open a new topic referencing the old one.
* Specify the installed WAPT version, full version, and build number (2.2.1.11957 / 2.2.2.12337 / etc.) as well as the Enterprise/Discovery edition.
* Versions 1.8.2 and earlier are no longer supported. The only questions accepted regarding version 1.8.2 are related to upgrading to a supported version (2.1, 2.2, etc.).
* Specify the server OS (Linux/Windows) and version (Debian Buster/Bullseye - CentOS 7 - Windows Server 2012/2016/2019).
* Specify the OS of the administration/package creation machine and the machine with the problematic agent, if applicable (Windows 7/10/11/Debian 11/etc.).
* Avoid asking multiple questions when opening a topic, otherwise it may be ignored. If there are multiple topics, open separate topics, preferably one after the other and not all at the same time (i.e., do not spam the forum).
* Include code snippets, screenshots, and other images directly in the post. Links to Pastebin, Bitly, and other third-party sites will be systematically removed.
* As with any community forum, support is provided voluntarily by members. If you require commercial support, you can contact Tranquil IT's sales department at 02.40.97.57.55
-
dcardon
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 1929
- Registration: June 18, 2014 - 09:58
- Location: Saint Sébastien sur Loire
- Contact :
Hi Benoit,
there were some issues with the Lazarus/FreePascal compilation used in WAPT. But there have been very recent updates that seem to fix the problem [1]. We'll therefore be able to run internal tests again, and if they're successful, we should be able to have a WAPT version for Windows arm64 in the coming months.
See you soon,
Denis
[1] https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/in ... #msg537654
there were some issues with the Lazarus/FreePascal compilation used in WAPT. But there have been very recent updates that seem to fix the problem [1]. We'll therefore be able to run internal tests again, and if they're successful, we should be able to have a WAPT version for Windows arm64 in the coming months.
See you soon,
Denis
[1] https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/in ... #msg537654
Denis Cardon - Tranquil IT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
-
cg_heuliez
- Messages: 12
- Registration: Nov 13, 2024 - 08:23
Thanks for the information.
Have you made any progress with your tests?
Have you made any progress with your tests?
-
dcardon
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 1929
- Registration: June 18, 2014 - 09:58
- Location: Saint Sébastien sur Loire
- Contact :
Hi Benoit,
we've made some fixes to the AMD64 agent to improve its compatibility with Rosetta on Windows ARM64.
Regarding native compilation on Windows ARM64, the necessary fixes haven't yet been implemented in the Free Pascal compiler.
Regards,
Denis
we've made some fixes to the AMD64 agent to improve its compatibility with Rosetta on Windows ARM64.
Regarding native compilation on Windows ARM64, the necessary fixes haven't yet been implemented in the Free Pascal compiler.
Regards,
Denis
Denis Cardon - Tranquil IT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
-
cg_heuliez
- Messages: 12
- Registration: Nov 13, 2024 - 08:23
Thanks for your reply!
Now, will this architecture really take off in the enterprise? I'm not so sure... Intel is trying to catch up with Lunar Lake...
Now, will this architecture really take off in the enterprise? I'm not so sure... Intel is trying to catch up with Lunar Lake...
-
dcardon
- WAPT Expert
- Messages: 1929
- Registration: June 18, 2014 - 09:58
- Location: Saint Sébastien sur Loire
- Contact :
Hi again Benoit,
I found the Rosetta emulation layer quite impressive at first glance (it would take a month to form a more detailed opinion, but the first impression was really good
). So for simple business cases, I wouldn't be surprised if it could take off; time will tell!
Best regards,
Denis
I found the Rosetta emulation layer quite impressive at first glance (it would take a month to form a more detailed opinion, but the first impression was really good
). So for simple business cases, I wouldn't be surprised if it could take off; time will tell!Best regards,
Denis
Denis Cardon - Tranquil IT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
Share your experiences on WAPT! Send us your blog and article URLs in the "Your Opinion of the forum, and we'll feature them on the WAPT
